Systematic reviews remain a cornerstone of evidence‐based research, providing comprehensive syntheses of primary study findings to support clinical and policy decision-making. Central to the integrity ...
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee on Finding What Works in Health Care: Updating Standards for Systematic Reviews will hold an an open session webinar on February ...
On April 2, 2024, Critical Reviews in Toxicology published an article titled “A systematic review of the epidemiology evidence on talc and ...
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included cohort studies that explored the association between walking speed and the risk of type 2 diabetes in adults. We used random-effects ...
Objective To evaluate systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of exercise on general cognition, memory and executive function across all populations and ages. Methods ...
A staggering 3 million+ scientific papers are published every year (that’s one roughly every 10 seconds). For the average researcher, keeping up feels less like a pursuit of knowledge and more like ...
Objectives This review aimed to provide a pooled estimate of injury incidence and epidemiology in women’s ice hockey.Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed ...
Systematic sampling is straightforward and low risk, offering better control. However, it may introduce sampling errors and ...
Objectives Maternal dietary practices are vital for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, comprehensive ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results