Story highlights DOJ fires additional staff from Trump-related prosecutions Firings affect election interference and ...

Where a reasonable jury could conclude that Truist’s proffered innocent reasons for its adverse actions were pretexts, its ...

Where the record showed the claimant’s transportation to and from the jobsite was essentially part of the contract of ...

Where a woman claimed she suffered a nerve injury after receiving two vaccine injections, but CVS was immune for its ...

Where an employee prevented her employer from learning why her condition required the accommodations that she asked for, she ...

Where homeowners argued a high-pressure natural-gas pipeline required a special exemption from the Board of Supervisors, this ...

Where the parties disputed the term “or less” that appears throughout the challenged patent claims, the court construed this ...

Where the pro se defendant removed a lawsuit seeking partition of real property to federal court, but there was no federal ...

Where the circuit court held permissive use should have been pleaded as an affirmative defense to adverse possession, it ...

Where a condominium unit owner sued the Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court and judges of the Arlington Circuit Court ...

Where a woman alleged her equestrian protective vest failed to inflate after she was thrown from a horse, and the distributor ...

Where a senior vice president led the business unit where the plaintiff worked before his position was eliminated, was ...