Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.

By Jan Wolfe Jan 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday over President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Here are some takeaways from the ...

The U.S. Supreme court hears arguments in Trump v. Cook, which concerns whether the president can fire governors of the U.S.

"Let's talk about the real-world downstream effects of this. Because if this were set as a precedent, it seems to me, just thinking big picture, what goes around comes around." ...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared likely to leave Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, on the job while her challenge to President Donald Trump’s […] ...

The Justices sound ready to frown on his firing of Lisa Cook.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in Trump v. Cook, a monumental case testing Donald Trump’s ability to fire ...

During arguments Wednesday, key justices appeared concerned that president’s efforts to oust Lisa Cook could imperil the central bank’s independence.

The Supreme Court signaled deep skepticism Wednesday that President Donald Trump had the authority to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve, with several conservative justices joining their ...

Supreme Court weighs whether Trump has broad authority to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, who Trump alleges ...

Conservative justices joined their liberal colleague in peppering the administration’s lawyer with questions about Trump’s ...

The justices are clearly struggling with what kind of opportunity Lisa Cook deserves to defend herself from President Trump’s ...